On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, David Roundy wrote: >> Ah, I see this is talked about on http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/DarcsTwo >> >> I must have read it some time ago and forgotten about it. >> >> Anyway, from where I'm sitting, this just shows that primitive patches >> must be named [...], > > No, it doesn't show any of that. It just shows that we need to fix > darcs, because it's buggy.
To me, the suggestion on that page of "atomization" and giving predictable names to the resulting patches is strong evidence that naming primitive patches is the right thing to do. Cheers, Ganesh _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
