Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 19:36:18 -0400, David Roundy wrote: >> This could be controversial, so I'll wait a bit for comments. It's >> also a tiny change, so it's not hard to revert... > > I initially wanted to change the default, but then I got scared off > because I realised it's not just flipping a switch, but rewriting some > of the internal code to change its assumptions about what happens when > there are no relevant opts. > > If you are willing to wade in and make this change, and you think we can > do it pretty safely, I am willing for the upcoming release to be called > darcs 2.1. Otherwise, I was just trying to be prudent :-)
Eric, If you haven't already done so, please document your findings in a comment on the relevant BTS issue. That will avoid duplicated effort if someone volunteers to hack on this. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
