On Nov 9, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Petr Rockai wrote: > So, what others think? We have just recently standardised on a > single way to write functional tests (namely bash). The cost of > another switch might be just too high.
This is a good point. I think a consequence of it is that cygwin should be considered to be required for doing darcs development on Windows. I, too, am trying not to state my opinion too strongly. In my case that's because I'm not a big contributor of test code. He who writes the code gets to choose, to some degree. Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
