On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:15:40AM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 09:23:25 +0100, Petr Rockai wrote: > > I can confirm that --no-pristine-tree is ignored for hashed repos. Whether > > that's intentional or a bug, I can't tell. I'd consider it a documentation > > bug > > at least (or commandline parsing, if you will, I'd expect darcs to at least > > issue a warning that it is ignoring the flag). > > It seems like this is the kind of feature we can just remove altogether > without causing much pain to our users. > > Thoughts?
I'll go along with the majority on this one. If we keep it, I'll make the documentation clear that it is only (currently) supported for non-hashed (i.e. deprecated) repos. The code would also need to emit a warning (similar to what's now done for --partial on a darcs-2 repo). _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
