>> Am I the only person to have a restrictive quota on my web server?
>> No-pristine-tree repos are designed to have all the good features of normal
>> repos, but to use less space. None of the suggested alternatives do that.
> I think --no-pristine-tree and --no-working-tree are orthogonal,
Yes, they are.
I have no objection to no-working-tree, and will most likely use it myself
under some circumstances. But I do need no-pristine-tree to stay.
> Remember that this discussion came up because the current implementation
> of --no-pristine-tree is only compatible with the legacy repo formats,
That's a bug, then, which I haven't noticed because all of my ``old''
repositories are in the classic format. I'll be mighty grateful to anyone
who decides to fix it.
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
