On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:49:49PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > In that case I'd just have normal repos on the web server, but another > > option would be to use a "smart" server that utilizes "darcs show > > contents" and "darcs show files". > > Am I the only person to have a restrictive quota on my web server? > > No-pristine-tree repos are designed to have all the good features of normal > repos, but to use less space. None of the suggested alternatives do that.
I think --no-pristine-tree and --no-working-tree are orthogonal, but have some overlap -- i.e. while --no-working-tree works with --disable, it can also be used to save space. Remember that this discussion came up because the current implementation of --no-pristine-tree is only compatible with the legacy repo formats, so people using darcs-2 format *think* they're saving space but actually aren't (because --no-pristine-tree is silently ignored for darcs-2 repos). _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
