Ashley Moran <[email protected]> writes: > On 9 Apr 2009, at 14:36, Eric Kow wrote: >> I think the conclusion was that I would (somewhat reluctantly) accept >> patches for darcs push --mark-conflicts and darcs push --allow- >> conflicts >> being options. > > Thanks for the link. Sorry for not searching the archives. > > How about making `darcs push --mark-conflicts` and `darcs push > --allow-conflicts` only work on local repositories?
I think the blocker on this work is a volunteer to write the code. An implementor could certainly start off by supporting these options only on local repos, but I think they are just as useful for remote repos, so I'd still like that functionality as an end goal. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
