> This is for all files edited with edit_file. At the moment it is used > for send and record descriptions.
... > Descriptions should not be very big. So I do not think reading file > content would harm performance or memory usage significantly. > > Use case: I do darcs send --edit-description. While editing the > description I recall that I forgot something (this happens quite often > to me). I type :q! in vim to exit without saving and answer 'n' to > abort. Thanks! I'm going to apply this and see if anybody from darcs-users complains. > IIRC there was a bug requesting this feature. But I could not find it. > Or was it a mail on ML? Is this the discussion you were thinking of? http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2008-November/015848.html Maybe we need to revisit the confirmations there? Cheers, -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgp69p0rLKCCx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
