Hi, Max Battcher <[email protected]> writes: >> I repeat the text for convenience. >> >> Interactive hunk edit: >> - This edit will not affect your working copy >> - To split a block of added text, remove the part you want to postpone > > Given the Before/After distinction (which I think I like), perhaps this would > be slightly less confusing if it were "after text" rather than "added text". >> - To split a block of removed text, copy back the part you want to retain > > I don't think that "removed text" is as confusing as "added text", but I'm not > sure why that is to me. It could probably likewise be "before text", but then > I > think "copy back" becomes confusing... Sadly, this is not what it means. : - ( The removed text is text missing from "AFTER", (and is mentioned in "BEFORE"). If all you do is remove a block of text, the editor will look like this:
> Interactive hunk edit: > - This edit will not affect your working copy > - To split a block of added text, remove the part you want to postpone > - To split a block of removed text, copy back the part you want to retain > - Arbitrary editing is supported > > ======================== BEFORE (for reference) ======================== > rambling robot > red rover > ======================== AFTER (edit below) ============================ > ======================== (edit above) ================================== that's why you are supposed to "copy back" stuff -- from the BEFORE section to the AFTER section. Yours, Petr. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
