Reinier Lamers <[email protected]> writes: > 2010/1/21 Petr Rockai <[email protected]>: >>> I don't think that "removed text" is as confusing as "added text", but I'm >>> not >>> sure why that is to me. It could probably likewise be "before text", but >>> then I >>> think "copy back" becomes confusing...
> I, too find Eric's proposal generally very clear, with "copy back" > being the only phrase that's slightly confusing. More specifically, > it's just the "back" actually. From where to where is that? > > I find it hard to think of a clearer formulation that would fit within > in a single line though. Perhaps we can replace "copy back" by "add > in", because if the AFTER state is the only thing the user is supposed > to edit, he knows he should add it there. One more idea about the split hint: - To split a hunk, edit the AFTER area: - for hunks adding text, remove the lines that you want to postpone - for hunks removing text, copy the lines you want to retain from BEFORE (works with s/lines/part/ as well) Yours, Petr. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
