On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 12:04:01 +0100
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
> * no branches. Don't add them! The one-branch-per-repo model is much
> better
Thinking out loud here.
If I had to vote today I'd say:
-1 on branches in the default darcs
Perhaps being able to point to various repos in the
darcs configuration and call them "branches" might be
cool. But come to think of it it's probably better
to just call them repositories and add options to,
say, the diff sub-command to be able to handle
other repositories. Maybe provide some short-hand for
repo naming and call that short-hand label a "branch"
name. Seems like checking out a "branch" is just
switching your defaultrepo.
Anyway, adding what
amounts to a lot of syntatic sugar into the default
darcs does not appeal. One way to do something is always
less confusing than many ways to do the same thing.
+1 on tracking date/owner of original commit in the default darcs
Karl <k...@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
