Hi, this technic aims at solving all kinds of blurs (static and motion blurs). The most challenging configuration is when the blur is not uniform along the image. I fear that applying geometric corrections before deblurring could modify the spatial distribution of the blur in the corners and lead to some inconsistencies in the solution.
However, I'm working on a masked implementation which would take only a relevant portion (512×512 px) of the image as an input for performance purposes, so at the end, the order of applyance of the modules might not make a difference. *Aurélien PIERRE* aurelienpierre.com <http://aurelienpierre.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Le 2017-10-14 à 10:54, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit : > Am Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017, 22:30:51 CEST schrieb Aurélien PIERRE: > > [...] > >> I believe that it should be applied right after denoising since this is >> low-level signal processing. Also a Total Variation and a Wiener filter >> denoising methods should be added to the modules for better results with >> the deconvolution (Total Variation is litteraly a gradient computation >> plus 3 lines of code similar to the Unsharp Mask equation ; I'm not >> familiar with Wiener filters, althouh they come often in the litterature >> as a RL pre-processor). > Wouldn't it be better to have it after lens distortion? If it's meant to fix > camera shake then having lens distortion in the way seems like a bad idea. > >> mit herzlichen Grüße ;-) > :) > >> *Aurélien PIERRE* >> aurelienpierre.com <http://aurelienpierre.com> > Tobias ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
