On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 03:09:30PM +0200, johannes hanika wrote: > ah, i missed that piece of information. no, i'm using vanilla jpeg here.
Over this weekend, I was trying to remove the libjpeg-turbo installation in order to use just the vanilla libjpeg. I'll gladly give up the speed boost it gives if I can only export reliably. However, it seems to be the only implementation of libjpeg8 available for Ubuntu, and libtiff (both 4 and 5) depends on libjpeg8. So, I'm curious how you have a non-turbo libjpeg8 setup. As indicated earlier, I'm running Gnome Ubuntu, which might have slightly different libs. I'll be trying to get a stock Ubuntu setup ASAP to see if that differs. > quite possible that we use the library slightly wrong and one of the > implementations handles it gracefully? It could be, though I'm not seeing it. Our usage seems pretty simple, and the start/end happen after all the other processing is completed. I'll look at the code again to see if I can spot something, but as of yet I'm baffled. -- Bruce Guenter <br...@untroubled.org> http://untroubled.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
