Am 19.05.2014 19:02, schrieb Mark Heieis: > > On 2014-05-18 01:44, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: >> The history is just that -- a (very coarse) undo stack. It has no (real >> world) >> influence on the processing time of an image. > For my own clarity, if I had, for example, 4 exposure settings on the history > stack, only the last (top) one in the queue is applied and the previous 3 are > ignored? Or said another way, the 4 stack entries are not cumulative/repeated > in > the processing queue and this is how it would work for all equal applied > styles? > > If this is the case, then compressing the history stack has no impact on > image > processing or end result?
Right. It just removes visual clutter. Regards, Markus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
