>This usage seems broken to me.
Agreed.
This seems even more strange knowing that basecurve-in-tonecurve stuff
landed after (IIRC) we knew we were planning on adding yet another *curve
close to the end of the pipe, that will deprecate basecurve iop.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net> wrote:
> Hi Roman,
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> > >3. if the tonecurve iop is used with this curve I need to deactivate
> > the
> > >basecure iop. This is not convenient as I'll need to use multiple
> > >instance for the tonecure which is far more generic than the
> > basecurve.
> >
> > What is the question?
>
> Indeed not a question more a remark that having the tonecurve replacing
> the basecurve is misleading as you need to *manually* deactivate the
> basecurve which is well the *base* curve applied to all RAW
> automatically by darktable. This usage seems broken to me.
> --
> Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)
>
> The best way to travel is by means of imagination
>
> http://v2p.fr.eu.org
> http://www.obry.net
>
> gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
