That looks very interesting. But I have a question. The image showed much less noise. But can you also use profiled denoise with this approach, or is there an inherent conflict?
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 at 17:45 Vidar Hoel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > some time ago I noticed that the JPGs from my Nikon were better then > what I could achieve from processing the RAW-file (NEF) in Darktable. > After some digging on the Internet, I figured out I could use an > alternative to the default base-curves in Darktable - and that made me > get a better starting-point when processing my Nikon RAW-files (and I > was able to achieve a better image than the JPGs from my camera!) > > Today I finished a step-by-step video of what I did, so anyone can see, > learn and perhaps do it themselves. > > Some notes before viewing: > - I am not really sure behind the technology behind this. I am not sure > if a Nikon RAW-file has a profile embedded, but it seems so. > - I am not sure if there is an other way to achieve this is Darktable? > - As explained in the video, you will need Windows, or a friends laptop > with Windows, once, to make this work. > - My native language is not English :-) > > https://youtu.be/O1nS3URVSYA > > Enjoy :-) > > Best regards, > Vidar Hoel > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > [email protected] > > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
