Hi,
No, I use the "denoise (profiled)" as before, and it works the same way,
regardless of what modules (base curve or input color profile) I have
applied before. It sure seems like it, anyway.
Regards,
Vidar Hoel
On 26. juli 2016 19:09, Colin Adams wrote:
That looks very interesting.
But I have a question. The image showed much less noise. But can you
also use profiled denoise with this approach, or is there an inherent
conflict?
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 at 17:45 Vidar Hoel <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
some time ago I noticed that the JPGs from my Nikon were better then
what I could achieve from processing the RAW-file (NEF) in Darktable.
After some digging on the Internet, I figured out I could use an
alternative to the default base-curves in Darktable - and that made me
get a better starting-point when processing my Nikon RAW-files (and I
was able to achieve a better image than the JPGs from my camera!)
Today I finished a step-by-step video of what I did, so anyone can see,
learn and perhaps do it themselves.
Some notes before viewing:
- I am not really sure behind the technology behind this. I am not sure
if a Nikon RAW-file has a profile embedded, but it seems so.
- I am not sure if there is an other way to achieve this is Darktable?
- As explained in the video, you will need Windows, or a friends laptop
with Windows, once, to make this work.
- My native language is not English :-)
https://youtu.be/O1nS3URVSYA
Enjoy :-)
Best regards,
Vidar Hoel
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to
[email protected]
<mailto:darktable-user%[email protected]>
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
