On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:44 AM, <junkyardspar...@yepmail.net> wrote: > Thanks for splitting the preset storage out from the image db, very happy to > see that, and the modifier keys on the sliders is a nice UI enhancement... if > I can retrain myself to use them!
> I've encountered one odd behavior, but can't quite seem to nail down exact > steps to reproduce: when viewing an image at 1:1 zoom, with lens correction > and profiled denoise enabled, it sometimes takes an *extremely* long time to > render the view, on the order of ~20 seconds or more instead of the typical > 3-4. This only happens with both of those modules enabled (even if they are > the only ones in the stack), and then only sometimes; I would say maybe about > 1 in 5 times when dragging the viewport box around in the thumbnail preview > with both modules enabled. I'm not using OpenCL. If I can narrow down the > circumstances a little more I'll file a bug report, but meanwhile maybe > somebody else with better knowledge of the internals can attempt to duplicate > this behavior... I doubt that is a bug. Especially profiled denoise is quite CPU-hungry. > -- > jys Roman. > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016, at 05:26, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: >> we’re proud to announce the first release candidate for the upcoming 2.2 >> series >> of darktable, 2.2.0rc0! > [...] > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
