Am Freitag, 6. Januar 2017, 21:41:58 CET schrieb Rico Heil: > Am 06.01.2017 um 21:07 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus: > > Am Freitag, 6. Januar 2017, 20:54:07 CET schrieb Rico Heil: > >> I just exported 2 RAWs from a Canon PowerShot S120 and a Canon EOS 5D Mk > >> III to jpeg. Both were rated "3 stars" in DT. > >> Opening them in XMViewMP I see the following in the "ExifTool" tab for > >> both jpegs: > >> - XMP Rating = "0" > >> - Exif Rating = "3" > >> > >> It seems the XMP Rating value is accidently overwritten with a zero > >> during export. > > > > Does the raw image have XMP Rating set? > > Good question! > It shows the 3 stars in DT (where the rating was done), but when I click > on the CR2 file in XNViewMP, it shows an XMP Rating of 0, but I cannot > find any EXIF Rating information - still the file is shown with 3 stars. > The corresponding sidecar file contains 'xmp:Rating="3"' (so this is > where XNViewMP take it's rating from). > > I just checked an older RAW file that was rated using some older DT > version. It looks the same (correct Rating in XMP sidecar file, but > zero-Rating in the RAW's XMP data which is it's only XMP field). > > So I made a new photo with the EOS 5D Mk III and downloaded it manually > to my computer (not using Rapid Photo Downloader as I usually do to > avoid any changes to the file). This RAW file already contains the > XMP-Rating 0 as it's only XMP field. > > I made another photo and used the camera's rating feature to appoint 2 > stars. As expected this value is written to the RAW's XMP rating field. > When opening this RAW in DT, the 2 star rating is shown correctly. > I changed this image's rating in DT to 3 stars, which is written to the > XMP sidecar file, but not to the RAW (which is the expected behaviour, > since DT promises not to make any changes to the RAW files). > > My guess is that during jpeg export, the XMP rating inside the RAW file > accidently takes precedence over the one in the XMP sidecar file. > Did someone add some code to copy all the RAW's XMP fields into the > jpeg, *after* DT's meta data has been written? > It smells like this kind of thing ;-)
That's why I asked about a rating inside the raw file. However, your initial file doesn't have rating set in the raw. I will have a look next week. Could you send me a file for which you encounter the bug? > Rico Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
