Am Dienstag, 7. August 2018, 21:56:41 CEST schrieb Robert Krawitz:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:30 -0700, I. Ivanov wrote:
> >> I'd be perfectly happy to get rid of the database and use sidecar
> >> files exclusively at least as an option.  I prefer a different tool
> >> for managing my image collection (KPhotoAlbum) and just use dt for
> >> image processing.
> > 
> > Maybe if you use ":memory:" as a library it would work for you.
> > 
> > man darktable
> > --library <library file>
> > 
> >             darktable keeps image information in an sqlite database for
> >  fast
> >             access.  The default location of that database file is
> >             "$HOME/.config/darktable/library.db".  You may give an
> >  alternative location, e.g. if you want to do some experiments without
> >  compromising your original library.db.  If the database file does not
> >  exist, darktable creates it for you.  You may also give ":memory:" as a
> >  library file in which case the database is kept in system memory - all
> >  changes are discarded when darktable terminates.
> 
> This is useful.
> 
> > I cannot advice on how to tie it with KPhotoAlbum ... but you can
> > import an image, process it and then remove it. (the Darktable DB
> > works well for me - in majority of cases)
> 
> What I'd like isn't specific to KPhotoAlbum.  I'd simply like to be
> able to invoke
> 
> darktable image1 image2...
> 
> without regard for directory structure.

You can just click on the reset button of the collect module after the images 
got imported to see them all. If used together with :memory: as the database 
you won't have images from previous sessions either.

Tobias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to