Am 02.12.18 um 15:52 schrieb Volker Lenhardt:
Activated openCL
Next image:
1118,913519 [dev_process_image] pixel pipeline processing took 0,434
secs (1,555 CPU)
Profiled denoise:
1219,319104 [dev_process_image] pixel pipeline processing took 18,669
secs (72,306 CPU)
There's practically no difference. BTW: the images are cr2 files with
sizes of about 23 MB.
What next?
For this case I would like to see the full output of 'darktable -d
opencl -d perf' with activated OpenCL from program start to where you
process the image with profiled denoise.
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
