On jeudi 16 janvier 2020 13:59:30 CET Anna Simon wrote: > What kind of computer are you using? > > I can definitely confirm that denoise profiled non-local is slower that > denoise profiled luma/chroma preset. So the difference you have measured > is probably correct. > No real reason to doubt his values but... > On 16.01.20 11:09, Christian wrote: > > Hi, > > can you confirm that the profiled-denoise is very slow > > with the default settings? > > > > My measurement (exporting 1 image): > > > > denoise off: 7.3 s > > raw denoise: 8.5 s > > denoise profiled default settings: 53 s (!) > > denoise profiled luma preset: 13.8 s > > > > OpenCL is disabled. > How were those times measured, and how often were the measurements repeated? If those are total times for the development, another process using the disk at the wrong moment can throw off the timing. And some system processes do write to disk (logging). The difference between no denoise, raw denoise and luma preset are not surprising, the time for profiled denoise at default settings is.
Remco ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
