Oh wow...so much for proclaimed standardisation by Adobe. Thanks much
On Sun., May 17, 2020, 11:09 Bernhard, <darkta...@intervalsignals.org> wrote: > > > J. Verreault schrieb am 16.05.20 um 14:56: > > Yes I converted from nef to dng and did not keep the nef. > > In my defense that happened many years ago when dng format first appeared > > where I was new to digital imagery. Adobe made it sound good to me and > > without much research I opted for the conversion. > > I don't remember if I embedded the nef during conversion...how can I > tell..? > either you see your .dng files beeing around twice the size than your > .nef - or you open your .dng-Konverter and see if you can extract your > .nef. > You find that option on the main screen in bottom line 2nd button from > left. > > darktable _does_ support .dng, but only if generated in-camera. That's > because there are 4 (or 5?) versions of .dng till now. > Imagine each of the native raw-formats multiplied by those number of dng > versions (multiplied by number of possible dng-converters) => noone can > test and verfiy and maintain all that stuff. > > (And also read the release notes of Adobe on all the bugs and > preconditions within their spec ... :( ) > > -- > > regards > Bernhard > > https://www.bilddateien.de > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
