On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Pascal de Bruijn <[email protected]>wrote:
> To be honest, if this would be implemented, I wonder what would happen
> to Lensfun. Contributions may drop even further, replacing free
> distortion correction with a dependence on the grace of Adobe.
>
My hope is a converter from the .lcp files to the xml ones that lensfun
needs, not to replace libraries.
Any particular problem with generating the corrections?
>
It's been in finding good images, yes. I've found some contrasty,
rectilinear architecture, but without correction, the images have lots of
chromatic abberation... which makes it hard to find pin-prick accuracy for
the control points.
The whole hugin process kindof sucks, too.
> Typically a lot of the problem is bad source imagery. I had some
> straight lines printed on A2 sized piece of paper and stuck it to a
> sheet of foam-board to keep it perfectly straight.
>
I'll try that, good idea. Architecture is unreliable!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and
much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow -
350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
