On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Matt Feifarek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Pascal de Bruijn <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> To be honest, if this would be implemented, I wonder what would happen >> to Lensfun. Contributions may drop even further, replacing free >> distortion correction with a dependence on the grace of Adobe. > > My hope is a converter from the .lcp files to the xml ones that lensfun > needs, not to replace libraries.
Heh, that fixes nothing. Unless Adobe releases all the lens correction profiles as public domain or some super liberal license. >> Any particular problem with generating the corrections? > > It's been in finding good images, yes. I've found some contrasty, > rectilinear architecture, but without correction, the images have lots of > chromatic abberation... which makes it hard to find pin-prick accuracy for > the control points. > > The whole hugin process kindof sucks, too. Did you try: http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/creating-lens-distorsion-models-with-hugin-lens-calibrator >> Typically a lot of the problem is bad source imagery. I had some >> straight lines printed on A2 sized piece of paper and stuck it to a >> sheet of foam-board to keep it perfectly straight. > > I'll try that, good idea. Architecture is unreliable! Quite :) Regards, Pascal de Bruijn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow - 350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
