Hallöchen! jeremy rosen writes:
> There is an important (but unavoidable) bias in the methodology > too... > > in your test you processed the image under lightroom then try to > reproduce the same result with DT > > this has sevral unfavorable consequences for DT (the same problem > would be reverted if you went the other way round, which is why I > say it's unavoidable) I think that this limitation of the experiment cannot be emphasised too much. Both Lr and DT are, well, some sort of "Turing-complete" concerning image editing. AFAICS, you can always reproduce Lr's result somehow -- but at least I am interested in creating beautiful pictures with little effort rather than mimicing Lr. If I cloned myself, and the Alter Ego would learn Lr and would use it, one could compare with what I create with DT. But nobody can do this experiment. If Lr is a model for DT, then because of its ease of use. And maybe for good low-level algorithms. I installed Lr one month ago. At first, I was shocked how few features it has -- I thought I had missed an "expert mode" or something like that. :-) But its UI seems to be more efficient than DT's. These few sliders seem to cover almost everything DT can do. I don't know whether a good features/sliders ratio is desirable (FWIW, I don't care very much), but at least it is a big difference between the two programs that is worth being evaluated. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger Jabber ID: [email protected] or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
