my picture looked better.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Björn Sonnenschein <[email protected]>wrote:
> I have played around with the Image in RawTherapee, seems that they have
> got an effective denoiser!
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6808928/rt.jpg
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 13.06.2013, 08:19 +0300 schrieb ary brami:
> > Hello Matthias,
> >
> > I'm agree with you, about the noise reduction, unfortunatelly. I was
> > sure before that test, that DT was closer than that...
> > I think that it's also due to the ISO level. Particularly on this
> > image where ISO 6400, DT don't achieve the job as good as LR. But on
> > ISO level lwer, DT is very good.
> >
> > We decide with two other bloger to continue this kind of test LR vs DT
> > once or twice a month, in order to know better if in some picture the
> > difference is realy smaller or if DT is even better than LR.
> >
> > Ary
> >
> > Le mercredi 12 juin 2013 à 07:58 +0200, Matthias Bodenbinder a écrit :
> > Am 11.06.2013 10:31, schrieb ary brami:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I just publish on my blog a post about developement of the same
> > image, with lightroom and darktable.
> > > The picture was VERY noisy (ISO 6400, at night), and on that point,
> > I must admit that I didn't achived to reduce the noise in Darktable as
> > well as in Lightroom.
> > > If somebody want to try to do better, the link to download the raw
> > file is in the post
> > here :
> http://aventurereflex.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/darktable-vs-lightroom-le-logiciel-dadobe-est-il-un-must-pour-les-photographes/
> > >
> > > We will renew this type of developement both in LR and in DT, sure
> > that some time, DR will be closer or even better thant LR.
> > >
> > > Ary
> > >
> >
> > Hello Ary,
> >
> > that is interesting. And I am actually shocked about the big
> > difference between Lightroom and Darktable. I find two aspects very
> > odd.
> >
> > (1) DT has a noise profile for the 600D at iso3200. Even with that it
> > is almost impossible to reduce the noise properly. And Denoise
> > (non-local means and bilateral) do not do any better. I thought that
> > noise profiles is the best you can get in terms of noise reduction.
> >
> > (2) The color cast in the background is weird. The blue background of
> > the DT image looks artificial while the grey background of the
> > Lightroom picture looks much more natural.
> >
> > And by the way, rawtherapee is not doing any better than DT.
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > Matthias
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> >
> > Build for Windows Store.
> >
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Darktable-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Darktable-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
