On 13 June 2013 21:53, Torsten Bronger <[email protected]>wrote:
> I installed Lr one month ago. At first, I was shocked how few
> features it has -- I thought I had missed an "expert mode" or
> something like that. :-) But its UI seems to be more efficient than
> DT's. These few sliders seem to cover almost everything DT can do.
> I don't know whether a good features/sliders ratio is desirable
> (FWIW, I don't care very much), but at least it is a big difference
> between the two programs that is worth being evaluated.
>
This was exactly what I was going on about when I was suggesting the UI
tweaks some time back. LR is just a lot more efficient, despite having
lower control over adjustments. I'm not looking to reduce darktable's
functionality by dumbing it down, but efficiency should not be forsaken
over pure functionality.
With darktable, users have to spend more time to produce a reasonable
looking image, compared to Lightroom. This has nothing to do with the look
of the image that Lightroom or darktable can produce; I'm talking about
producing a baseline usable image, regardless of trying to reproduce what
another program does. This can be improved, and I'm hoping there's a way to
do it without sacrificing the overall functionality or performance of
darktable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
