On 06/30/2013 01:09 AM, HaJo Schatz wrote:
Hi!
> +1 for that. Not entirely sure, but I guess DT writes a
> thumbnail to the XMP. DigiKam doesn't pick that up but
> instead uses the thumbnail in the RAW.
Even if, it only solves part of the problem, as you'd need
to go back to dt to work on such an image anyway.
[...]
> So would DigiKam have to understand the processing stack
> of DT and develop it?
This IMHO will not work as any other processing software
would then need to interface with dts modules. That's IMHO
the primary reason why DT should do metadata properly, and
also be the image database. (Being able to write lock
certain parts would be appreciated then.)
--
Kind regards, / War is Peace.
| Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner | Ignorance is Strength.
|
| Theory : G. Orwell, "1984"
/ In practice: USA, since 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
