A raw file keeps all of our options open: We can at any time produce a 
small jpg for a slide show or sell a giant print from a tiff. Raw files 
are not massive in size and compare in storage with a full sized 100% jpg.

David
On 13-12-02 02:03 PM, junkyardspar...@yepmail.net wrote:
> This very closely mirrors my feelings/use case. In fact, I'm increasingly not 
> even keeping most of my RAW files if I still like the "developed" JPEG a week 
> later. Before you become horrified, just consider that different people have 
> different reasons for taking pictures, and don't have to be "serious" 
> photographers to want to use darktable's excellent RAW developing suite. In 
> my case, I just want to end up with a better final JPEG than the one I would 
> be getting out of the camera. While this may be a very foreign use case for 
> many people using this software, I'd like to think that it's a valid one. :)
>
> On 2013-12-02 c...@cs.toronto.edu wrote:
>>   Darktable is the best RAW developer on Linux today (in my opinion and
>> I looked at all of the ones that I could find, including commercial
>> options). If I had a choice between 'Darktable with DAM' and a program
>> that was just as good without DAM, I would be using the latter because
>> it is all that I need. But I don't. If I want the best RAW developer on
>> Linux, well, it comes with a bunch of DAM features that I don't want and
>> I get to work around them as best I can.
>>
>>   I'd like to ask everyone to consider this use-case too. I think it
>> speaks well for Darktable that it is the best RAW developer for Linux,
>> not just 'a RAW developer with DAM'. But it does mean that there are
>> people who are just going to be interested in the RAW developer side of
>> it.
>>
>> (One of the many reasons that I'm not interested in Darktable's DAM is
>> that I have already migrated from one RAW developer to Darktable. I have
>> no particular guarantees that I won't be making a similar migration
>> in the future and accordingly I very much don't want all of my asset
>> management locked up inside a program that I may have to abandon in the
>> future. Today I do asset management through the filesystem because I am
>> pretty sure that anything will be able to deal with that, one way or
>> another. In fact the RAW developer that I migrated away from had its own
>> DAM, which I also didn't use. That turned out to be a really good thing
>> in the end.)
>>
>>      - cks
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Darktable-users mailing list
> Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to