On 2014-02-24 [email protected] wrote: > I noticed that it doesn't seem to do much on-screen (performance reasons > I suppose), but once the image is exported the noise reduction is > fantastic -
Well, considering that (AFAIK) the profile is specific for the full-resolution raw pixels, applying it to the scaled preview is never going to be a very accurate approximation of the final results, I suppose... viewing a representative section of the image at 1:1 can give you a good sense of what it's doing, though. It would be interesting to have an option to "commit" a noise reduction setting in preview, which would require waiting (after a warning) while it was applied to the full image before scaling to preview, and stored for use as the basis of all further previews until a change was made to the noise reduction settings (or anything else that precedes it in the pipe). Don't know if that would be a very popular feature, though. > Higher ISOs were more tricky to keep out of focus due to having to close > up the aperture and gain a bit too much depth of field, but I think they > were unfocused enough. I would think that if you didn't have a "real" ND filter handy, you could use just about anything with those basic characteristics (tinted piece of plastic, etc.) over the lens, since image quality doesn't seem to be an issue... someone correct me if I'm wrong. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool. Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFlow Analyzer Customize your own dashboards, set traffic alerts and generate reports. Network behavioral analysis & security monitoring. All-in-one tool. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=126839071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
