Hi
I'm using a profiled display and I believed that Darktable was writing
sRGB jpegs, but it turns out it's writing "Darktable sRGB".
When using one of these images on Blogger for my photography blog, the
colours go very wrong.
I expect that Blogger is completely ignoring the colour profile and just
stripping it out, but the results are not good.
I have added sRGB.icm (found a few copies of this on my system, although
annoyingly they're all slightly different - hmmm) into
~/.config/darktable/color/out/ and re-saved my work using that.
This appears to result in output that is truer to the version seen in
darktable.
Does this sound like the right thing to do?
Shouldn't DT ship with a standard
<http://www.color.org/srgbprofiles.xalter#v2> sRGB profile?
What's the DT sRGB anyway?
Thanks,
Rich
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
