Urs Schütz wrote on 14/03/2015 01:59:
On 03/13/15 19:52, Chris wrote:
Tobias Ellinghaus wrote on 13/03/2015 23:40:
Am Freitag, 13. März 2015, 22:17:58 schrieb Chris:

Thanks Ulrich.

If I play with the input color profile module and change the profile
from "enhanced color matrix" to  "linear Rec709 RGB" the result is much
closer to the camera's jpeg :-)

Does that mean I must choose this profile for all these camera raws ?
You shouldn't change the color profile but the gamut clipping. Big difference.
tried but far worse than changing the color profile !

Chris


Chris

Tried the raw image conversion. Using an extreme white balance (spot, 
window in the dark right corner and some of the lights, reduced red) and 
an extreme base curve, solved some of the issues. The out of camera jpg 
has more red, i had no success with that (too much ugly red noise).
Darktable from git (1.7.0+1120~g13c11fb) has a new color reconstruction 
for blown out areas, which helps a lot with the highlights.

Here is a style for Darktable 1.7.0+1120~g13c11fb from git:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mz1hmbs9zmpyuok/BlueSmokeShowWithRedBackground.dtstyle?dl=0

And here the result:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gaebux1a2hzgsiu/p2010285.jpg?dl=0

Urs


Excellent !
But I don't understand why the input color profile "enhanced color matrix" has not the best results.
Isn't it supposed to be optimized for the camera ?

Chris

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to