Agree. Raw+Jpg groups are good enough.

There are other ways to make the lighttable better workflow better to 
identify images faster:

a) Better hierarchical tag module.

b) Improve metadata editor (bigger space for description field with 
multiple lines).

c) Show more custom info values (can be setup in settings) on top of 
every small image in lighttable (not only in zoom mode):
     Shutter, Aperture, ISO, Exposure comp value (-1, 0, +2) when image 
overlay is enabled.

d) The focus mask function is great. But it will be even greater if it 
can be optionally viewed on every image also.
      Then it will be very easy to identify images not in focus.

)-|algeir


Den 19. april 2015 16:41, skrev Torsten Bronger:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Stefan Klinger writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> Maybe one can allow tags to carry (primitive) information (maybe
>>>> it's possible already, but I did not see this), or, allow the
>>>> user to add image properties just as tags can be added.  Via
>>>> this, grouping could be implemented as a special case of
>>>> tagging:
>>>>
>>>>    * On Importing, tag `grouping|shot` should be set to the same value
>>>>      for all images recognised as coming from the same shot (maybe,
>>>>      just as now, the image_id of the raw).  That's what the default
>>>>      grouping is doing right now for raw and jpeg.
>>>>
>>>>    * It would also be possible to have different groups in parallel.
>>>>      The tag `grouping|burst` might be set to a common value for all
>>>>      images shot within a very short timespan.
>>>>
>>>>      Then the “collapse groups” switch would turn into “collapse
>>>>      by tag”.  Collapsing by the tag `grouping|shot` would do
>>>>      what happens now
>>>>
>>>> Is that a feasible perspective?
>>> It is rather complex and convoluted.
>> What is convoluted?  Is it making tags carry values?
> Yes, it introduces an intermediate step, it is more difficult to
> explain, it exposes internal database IDs to the user, and it
> optimizes rare cases.  Besides, how do you handle ID clashs?
>
> The audience of DT is rather technophile I suspect, but still I
> personally like as it is now, keeping it simple and stupid: If DT
> detects something that should become a group -- only RAW+JPEG so far
> AFAICS -- it makes them a group.  The user can group the remaining
> cases manually.
>
> Tschö,
> Torsten.
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to