On 18/04/15 07:58, Torsten Bronger wrote: > Tobias Ellinghaus writes: > >> [...] >> >> - rating/rejecting an image does the same to all images in the >> group iff the group is collapsed. >> > [...] Maybe I have a too strong hacking background, but I > consider image groups like a directory: If I remove a directory in > the file explorer, all of its contents is removed with it. > Similarly for color labels and metadata. Besides, making exceptions > makes the whole concept more complicated for the user. > > Maybe your concerns can be addressed by making groups more obvious, > at least when selected.
On a second thought, I think that I agree with Torsten. The group = directory idea is quite intuitive. And I agree that the current visual hints of grouped images can be reinforced. Another reason for which I do not use DT for culling/reject is because I do not really delete the images the first time. I use a script to physically move them to a directory on a disk out of the backup chain, and leave them there a couple of weeks before definitely delete them. If it was possible to redefine the "delete" for `rm` to `mv` that will be really nice... Romano -- Romano Giannetti http://www.rgtti.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
