On 30/06/15 14:57, Dave wrote: > I only ever seen one of three options : > Red, probably focused sharp > Blue, less focused but still alright > Neither red nor blue, totally out of focus. >
I think that the discrimination is somewhat related to the average details level in the image, so that if your image is uniformly blurred (or sharp) the results are quite strange. When you have very distinct sharp and blurred area it works ok: http://i.imgur.com/NzhFuI3.png (Notice that this is the screenshot of a preview, the real image of the flower is quite sharper of what is shown here). In my opinion is just a way to have an idea on where the sharpest zone is, if it exists. I would still prefer a way to have two images side by side to check, like in the lighttable function of digikam... Romano -- Romano Giannetti, Ph.D, Electronic Engineer, Professor http://www.rgtti.com/ -- -- Romano Giannetti http://www.rgtti.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
