(Please keep discussions in-list instead of sending personal emails) On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Bertwim <[email protected]> wrote: > Weird logic. If I shoot raw+jpg, and the jpg is ok, there is no need to > process further, and I keep both raw + jpg. If edits are needed, I have the > raw, and throw away/overwrite the camera generated jpg. Big deal.
And now you have a bunch of output files, some straight from the camera, some processed from raw. Colors/curves/noise/etc will not match so this is only really workable if you don't need consistency in your output. Since to be able to process raws you need to be happy with how the raw conversion output looks most people will just get that working well and then ignore what the camera does by default. > I am surprised to see how much reluctance there is to have a supported > workflow where certain images are just not supposed to be considered. People have given you opinions and potential solutions and your response has always been "but I want to do this in this strange way I invented". raw+jpeg is already a niche use case and your particular workflow even more so, don't expect much interest from developers. Cheers, Pedro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
