----- Original Message ----- > Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015, 19:55:51 schrieb Jean-Luc CECCOLI: > > Thanks to all for your explanations. > > > > However, the behaviour I would expect in my way to think is : > > > > a- I copy the settings form a picture > > > > b- I (some extra key)-paste to a series of pictures > > > > c- nothing obvious happens straight after, but > > > > d- as soon as I open one of the pictures in the darkroom, the settings are > > applied according to its exif data. > > > > Does that make sense ? Is it reasonable ? Todo-able (don't know if this > > term > > exists but, if not, I claim the copyrights !) ? > > What would happen when you export the image without going to darkroom after > pasting the settings?
Even without that: the thumbnail would show an image processed with some parameters that are not the current ones. > I see some big problems with that approach. We will > see, > maybe we can come up with something nice that automagically finds out if the > current values are to be copied or if they should be recomputed from the > image. I agree that if some magic is to be done, it should be done at "paste" time, not at "enter darkroom" time. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
