Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-li...@gmx.net> writes: > It seems that over time that the hdd-thumbnail cache may take up quite a > bit of storage space,
Quite a bit, but still a fraction of what your RAW files would take. So, if you have disk space issues, you should take less pictures or stop shooting RAW ;-). > The question is whether > thumbnails are worth to be included in backups, which take up time, > and that to decide would be nice for the user. Indeed, you can skip it from your backups. At worse, darktable-generate-cache, go take a cup of coffee, and your thumbnails will be back. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
