heya,

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Lefty Ace <leftyga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, Johannes.
>
> I checked darktablerc and both of those options were the opposite of what
> you listed. I changed them, so now I have:
>
> never_use_embedded_thumb=FALSE
> plugins/lighttable/low_quality_thumbnails=TRUE

i hope that's the old configuration and not the new one, right?

> After running darktable-generate-cache (which took a few hours for 4,000
> images), I now have high-quality previews, thank you!

sounds good anyways.

> I have two follow-up questions:
> 1) Does darktable refer to everything on the lighttable as a "thumbnail"? In
> other words, when I zoom in all the way in lighttable mode, what I see is
> affected by any settings referring to "thumbnail," even though it's now
> quite large on screen? If so, that probably means 1080p is the right setting
> if I want to view images on the lighttable at full-screen, right?

yes and yes.

> 2) During darktable-generate-cache, I received the following set of errors
> (repeated for a handful of images):
>
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 18246 (0x4746)
> encountered.
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 18249 (0x4749)
> encountered.
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 36867 (0x9003)
> encountered.
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 37398 (0x9216)
> encountered.
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 18246 (0x4746)
> encountered.
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 18249 (0x4749)
> encountered.
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 36867 (0x9003)
> encountered.
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 37398 (0x9216)
> encountered.
>
> Any idea what that means?

no but that should be relatively harmless (probably comes from
non-standard tags in tiff that is actually a raw or similar).

cheers,
 jo

>
> Thanks again for your help,
>
> -Owen
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:44 PM, johannes hanika <hana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> can you check your darktablerc for something similar to:
>>
>> never_use_embedded_thumb=true
>> plugins/lighttable/low_quality_thumbnails=false
>>
>> ?
>>
>> the size 4k is not a good idea if you don't need the thumbnails this
>> large.
>>
>> and yes, you need to recreate your cache (delete ~/.cache/darktable/
>> or wherever that is for you), and maybe you want to recreate them all
>> at once from the command line (man darktable-generate-cache).
>>
>> -jo
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Lefty Ace <leftyga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello Darktable users!
>> >
>> > I have a problem trying to use the lighttable view and I wonder if you
>> > could
>> > help.
>> >
>> > When I first import my raw files (Nikon NEFs), I can review them nicely
>> > in
>> > the lighttable. Zooming to full screen gives me a nice looking image,
>> > and I
>> > can use the left and right arrows to move through the current
>> > collection.
>> >
>> > After I edit an image, however, the preview shown in lighttable view
>> > looks
>> > very bad. Even if I only change whitebalance, the preview is now very
>> > low
>> > resolution. If I crop the image, the preview becomes absolutely
>> > terrible. It
>> > is as though the preview is based on a VERY low resolution version of
>> > the
>> > image.
>> >
>> > I have tried changing the setting "High quality thumb processing from
>> > size."
>> > Originally it was 720p, I have set it to 4k, and I don't see a
>> > difference.
>> > My monitor is 1920x1080, so 4k is more than enough resolution for
>> > full-screen. Do I need to do something to apply the new setting to files
>> > already in my library?
>> >
>> > My solution for now is to always export my images and then view the JPG
>> > files with another program. But this means I cannot enjoy darktable's
>> > great
>> > tagging and searching, since in order to see what the image actually
>> > looks
>> > like I must export it.
>> >
>> > The slideshow mode almost solves my problem, but I cannot go backwards,
>> > only
>> > forwards, and it is a little bit laggy since it is processing the full
>> > image.
>> >
>> > Any suggestions or advice would be much appreciated!
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
>> > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
>> > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
>> > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
>> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Darktable-users mailing list
>> > Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
>> >
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to