Am Dienstag, 1. März 2016, 07:36:33 schrieb Kristian Niemi:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 at 12:53 Matthieu Moy <[email protected]>
> 
> wrote:
> > Why are you using an old, development version? Using development
> > versions is strongly discouraged for real work, and now that 2.0(.1) is
> > out, I don't see much reason to use a 1.7 version.
> 
> Very good point. :-S
> 
> I updated git (url = git://github.com/darktable-org/darktable.git) and
> assumed it would be the latest dev version I'd build with ./build.sh. Seems

Yes, that's correct ...

> it's not, then? (Or is it just the prefix 1.7.0 that, for some reason, is
> wrong, and the +3401~g301affb part would show it's actually current?)

... and it's current. Please retry and see if the version starts with "2.1.0" 
now. If not I'd like to figure out what is happening as it might be a bug 
somewhere in our build system.

> Kind regards,
> Kristian

Tobias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to