I agree with Jesse...

Maybe it is best to take maven.eclipse.org down, but don't do anything else unless someone takes responsibility and there is funding to do so.

I currently publish EMF Texo/Teneo and EMF jars through sonatypeto get them on maven.central. It works fine, but I find it strange that eclipse projects have to use a 3rd party to get their code on maven central. I would expect eclipse.orgto provide a service similar to sonatype...

Just my 2 cents...

gr. Martin

With Regards, Martin Taal

Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mt...@springsite.com - mt...@elver.org
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org

On 01/31/2013 02:32 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
I really don't understand the point of resetting it if there is not a clear understanding of what roll it will serve within the organization moving forward and a recommended path for how projects will interact with it.

If it is only going to be a proxy for maven central, then that is fine and you should go for it, but if you're planning on having projects actually deploy to it and/or build out the story for syncing to maven central then all of that should be ironed out ahead of time and wired up accordingly.

Maven repositories are meant to be durable and exist forever, unlike orbit repositories that are transitory and exist for small windows of time. If you screw something up with Orbit then no biggy, it will eventually just disappear and problem solved. With a maven repository once it is released it is locked away for time eternal, which is why I am such a strong proponent of having staging repositories so upon release you can give things a pre-flight check before releasing it and locking it down.

Once you set this up and take ownership of it you are making a contract with anyone that uses it that you will support the stuff in there from that point on. None of this disappearing repository stuff where you check out an old tag and some repository you built against is now missing and perhaps replaced with a different version of some dependency.

cheers,
jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com <mailto:jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com>


On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Thanh Ha <thanh...@eclipse.org 
<mailto:thanh...@eclipse.org>> wrote:

    Hi Everyone,

    Per Bug 394792 I'm looking at moving maven.eclipse.org 
<http://maven.eclipse.org> to become a managed service at
    Eclipse. I plan on tackling this issue soon and was wondering if taking 
this server down would affect any projects?

    Some things we'd like to do is update the Nexus server version as well as 
restart the service from a fresh
    configuration, essentially start over.

    Thanks,


    Thanh
    _______________________________________________
    dash-dev mailing list
    dash-dev@eclipse.org <mailto:dash-dev@eclipse.org>
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev




_______________________________________________
dash-dev mailing list
dash-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev

_______________________________________________
dash-dev mailing list
dash-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev

Reply via email to