On 11 Oct 2009, at 03:06, Brian Smith wrote:

> isn't there just an in-memory adapter sans sqlite3?

There is indeed.  Does that mean that the failure to make a new  
Resource without its storage existing is not a bug after all?

-- 
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
http://aviewfromafar.net/








--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DataMapper" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to