I don't think it is, you can just set the repository to be an in memory adapter for that model. I think that's the correct way to do what you want. It essentially makes it perform like a normal class on steroids.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Ashley Moran < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On 11 Oct 2009, at 03:06, Brian Smith wrote: > > > isn't there just an in-memory adapter sans sqlite3? > > There is indeed. Does that mean that the failure to make a new > Resource without its storage existing is not a bug after all? > > -- > http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran > http://aviewfromafar.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
