@arun
Thank you

Couple of tasks:
1. Enhance our list of references on readme.md
https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries
It will help us as we work on the maps.

2.  Adding CENSUS_CODE_2011 codes for villages. It can be derived
from CENSUS_CODE_2001 codes. But needs work and validation.



Added contributing.md page
https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md


Thej
--
Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0

On 17 August 2016 at 21:17, Arun Ganesh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Its amazing to see this move forward with DataMeet, thank you Nisha and
> Thej for pushing this! Any immediate tasks with which others could support?
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Nisha Thompson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> @Sharad - To expand what Thej said:
>>
>> Thej and I met with lawyers at Alternative Law Forum in Bangalore.
>>
>> We discussed DataMeet, we are a community of people who believe in open
>> data and share data with one another over the group. The data is usually
>> government owned publicly available data that was procured through many
>> methods but sometimes data owned by individuals (companies, researchers,
>> students etc) are shared as well.
>>
>> We met with them regarding the mapping data we hold. Currently DataMeet
>> has the only publicly available Parliamentary and Assembly Constituency
>> shapefiles for download under OBDL, as well as District, some ward maps and
>> other isolated mapping information provided to us to maintain by the
>> community.
>>
>> When the community decided to start tackling the village files Thej and I
>> were concerned about having that much mapping data available from
>> government sources given the Survey of India's regulations regarding
>> mapping information.
>>
>> There is a lot of gray areas in the law and in the regulation. Basically
>> we should be concerned with copyright violation but it is unlikely that
>> they will go after you for that. It is important to create a sense of
>> demand, then document the process of getting and processing the information
>> and also that this information being shared is in the public interest.
>>
>> Copyright Law - Data is not technically copyrighted but the way it is
>> stored and created is. Maps are creations and interpretations of data
>> therefore a map is technically copyrighted. Making a copy of it and
>> changing it's format from one to another is a gray area in copyright. (Some
>> say yes some say no)
>>
>> Mapping Policy - Only the Survey of India is allowed to map and
>> distribute maps. However, they make a lot of partnerships with vendors and
>> distributors for their maps. Again taking an official GOI and SOI map
>> (Census, NIC village provided maps) and changing the format a gray area for
>> copyright but whether the SOI considered it a violation of their
>> distribution is another story.
>>
>> What it comes down to is our intent and how risk adverse we are.
>>
>> We are not very risk adverse and we believe in open data for public good,
>> so we decided to move forward with the effort but proceed cautiously and
>> deliberately.
>>
>> If the government asks us to take them down we will but we should be
>> prepared to make the case for why they should provide the maps.
>>
>> We spent some time collecting demand information from people on why
>> mapping information needs to be available and ideally in the open.
>> We articulated the need to have this information in the open and with the
>> Save the Map campaign in full swing at the same time there has been a
>> reasonable public conversation about the importance of mapping information
>> be available, not restricted, and in the open.
>> We then looked at the states that already had PDF maps of their villages
>> available and began to convert them, people contributed their individual
>> efforts in converting maps and over the last several months managed to get
>> the whole country in some form or the other.
>> Now we can finish processing them and get them out to the public.
>>
>> This is an ongoing conversation and we will continue having the
>> conversation with ALF and others so please send any questions.
>>
>> Nisha
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Arun Ganesh <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thej, if it helps, the OSM wiki probably has the most comprehensive
>>> documentation of the varying boundary levels in India
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India/Boundaries
>>>
>>> Would be great to get some experts well versed the the governance
>>> structure to take a look and provide feedback.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Thejesh GN <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @dev
>>>> I was planning to rename attributes because if someone converts these
>>>> geojsons  into shapefile then the name would remain same and reduce
>>>> confusion.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 16, 2016 1:49 PM, "Devdatta Tengshe" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >i will rename the attributes so the length of attribute name is 8.
>>>> Can you put an issue. Easy to track.
>>>> There is no need to do that. This is one of the limitations of the
>>>> shapefile format, and we have no such limitations when we have a GeoJSON
>>>> file.
>>>>
>>>> > in census, they use subdistrict. Is it same as Taluk?
>>>> Pretty much. In different parts of the country, sub districts are
>>>> called by different names. They can be called Taluk, Tehesil, Mandal,
>>>> Blocs, etc, depending on where you are in the country. hence the Census
>>>> came up with an Abstract name for them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Devdatta
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Thejesh GN <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @arun: i will rename the attributes so the length of attribute name is
>>>>> 8. Can you put an issue. Easy to track.
>>>>>
>>>>> @question:  in census, they use subdistrict. Is it same as Taluk?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also anyone has 2001 to 2011 village code mappings?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 15, 2016 9:32 PM, "Thejesh GN" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 August 2016 at 18:12, "Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]" <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> For some reason, this email by Thejesh did not show up datameet (or
>>>>>> maybe I just missed it?). So forwarding it to the group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thejesh, thanks for this. I have two queries:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Is this effort different from the effort by Nisha? My impression
>>>>>> was that we had (with the group) access to boundaries of many more 
>>>>>> states,
>>>>>> but the issue was copyright etc, and that Nisha, you and some others were
>>>>>> taking legal opinion on the same. Is what you have put out a result of
>>>>>> that? What is the legal opinion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Its the same effort, This is going to be our single effort. In this
>>>>> phase-1 we are going to publish boundaries of the villages for states 
>>>>> which
>>>>> are derived from the government websites. We are applying our license -
>>>>> ODBL to the additional skilled and creative work our volunteers do,
>>>>> designing, organizing, extracting, georeferencing, drawing missing areas,
>>>>> adding more attributes, cleaning etc and attribute/credit the source (Govt
>>>>> Website) for each state.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know there are more boundaries with complicated licenses. The talks
>>>>> are still on, as of now we are not publishing them. we will look at them 
>>>>> in
>>>>> phase-2. We will keep the list updated.
>>>>>
>>>>> So as of now its govt public data + DataMeet volunteer's creative
>>>>> work.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. I think I have asked this silly question on the group before, but
>>>>>> have to ask it again: what is the 'json' format, and why is it better to
>>>>>> put the data out in that format than in .shp? And how does one convert 
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> json to .shp?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Our boundaries are incomplete in some cases or might have errors.
>>>>> Hence we are maintaining them in git similar to source code, where any
>>>>> changes to the file can be seen tracked and seen.
>>>>>
>>>>> geojson or json is a simple text format. Which can be opened by a
>>>>> simple text editor and hence gives advantage to compare the versions, do a
>>>>> diff just like source code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shape files are a format by ESRI is more like a binary format. Its
>>>>> difficult to compare them on GitHub.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would suggest http://mapshaper.org/ (Its open source so you can run
>>>>> internally if required) . You can convert between
>>>>> Shapefiles/geojson/topojson. Work on them and export. I have attached
>>>>> screenshots.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been using it a lot and it has really great support for all
>>>>> formats. I would suggest you to use http://mapshaper.org/ and let the
>>>>> group know if you face any issues.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know if you have any more questions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> Sharad
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>> From: "Data{Meet}" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Date: 15 Aug 2016 10:27
>>>>>> Subject: [New post] Happy Independence Day and Open Indian Village
>>>>>> Boundaries
>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thejesh GN posted: "One of the longest and most passionately
>>>>>> discussed subject on the Data{Meet} list is the availability of Indian
>>>>>> Village Boundaries in Digital format. Search for Indian Village shape 
>>>>>> files
>>>>>> and you can spend hours on reading interesting conversations. Over"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New post on *Data{Meet}*
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?author=1> Happy Independence Day and Open
>>>>>> Indian Village Boundaries
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/2016/08/15/happy-independence-day-open-indian-village-boundaries/>
>>>>>>  by
>>>>>> Thejesh GN <http://datameet.org/?author=1>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the longest and most passionately discussed subject on the
>>>>>> Data{Meet} list is the availability of Indian Village Boundaries in 
>>>>>> Digital
>>>>>> format. Search for Indian Village shape files
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21searchin/datameet/India$20Village$20boundaries$20%7Csort:relevance>
>>>>>> and you can spend hours on reading interesting conversations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Over last two years different members of community have tried to
>>>>>> digitize
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21searchin/datameet/damle$20gujarat$20map%7Csort:relevance/datameet/zLP-eRtGxYY/FlQqBMriCAAJ>
>>>>>> the maps available through various government platforms or shared
>>>>>> the maps through their organizations
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/datameet/dBNmEToJ5CI>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A look at the list discussion tells you that boundaries of at the
>>>>>> least 75% of the states are available in various formats and quality. 
>>>>>> What
>>>>>> we need at this point is a consolidate effort to bring them all on par in
>>>>>> format, attributes and to some level quality. So some volunteers at
>>>>>> Data{Meet} agreed to come together, clean up the available maps, add
>>>>>> attributes, make them geojson and publish them on our GitHub repository
>>>>>> called Indian Village Boundaries
>>>>>> <https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course this will be an on going effort but we would love to reach
>>>>>> a baseline (all states) by year end. As of now I have cleaned up and
>>>>>> uploaded Gujarat. I have at the least 4 more states to go live by month
>>>>>> end. Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Goa. I will announce them on the
>>>>>> list as they go live.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The boundaries are organized by state using state ISO code. All the
>>>>>> village boundaries are available in geojson (WGS84, EPSG4326) format. 
>>>>>> The project
>>>>>> page <https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries> gives
>>>>>> you the status of the data as we clean and upload. Data is not perfect 
>>>>>> yet,
>>>>>> there could many errors both in data and boundaries. You can contribute 
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> sending the pull requests. Please use the census names when correcting 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> attributes and geojson for shapes and but please source them to an 
>>>>>> official
>>>>>> source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like everything else community creates. All map data will be
>>>>>> available under Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)
>>>>>> <http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/>. This data is
>>>>>> distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY;
>>>>>> without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
>>>>>> PARTICULAR PURPOSE. If you find issues we are more than happy to accept
>>>>>> corrections but please source them to an official source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On this 70th Independence day, as we celebrate the historic event of
>>>>>> India becoming Free and Independent, Data{Meet} community celebrates by
>>>>>> cleaning, formatting and digitizing our village boundaries. Have a great
>>>>>> time using the maps and contributing back to society.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries
>>>>>> <https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries> *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Picture: Kedarnath range behind the Kedarnath temple early morning.
>>>>>> By Kaustabh, Available under CCBYSA
>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:KedarRange.jpg>.
>>>>>> *Thejesh GN <http://datameet.org/?author=1>* | August 15, 2016 at
>>>>>> 10:26 am | Tags: featured
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=featured>, Indian
>>>>>> Village Maps
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=indian-village-maps>,
>>>>>> Maps <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=maps>, open access
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=open-access>, open data
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=open-data> |
>>>>>> Categories: Data <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=data>,
>>>>>> GIS <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=gis>, map
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=map>, mapping
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=mapping>, Open Data
>>>>>> India Watch
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=open-data-india-watch>
>>>>>> | URL: http://wp.me/p2Jc3f-FK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comment
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/2016/08/15/happy-independence-day-open-indian-village-boundaries/#respond>
>>>>>>    See all comments
>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/2016/08/15/happy-independence-day-open-indian-village-boundaries/#comments>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unsubscribe
>>>>>> <https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=759ccfb810341ca9efa9a780b9fe8394&email=sbadiger%40atree.org&b=%3FYLa-XFv%3F%25vJ0QUf6BfLkuXJRbZFHuFIWVgC2oZjnp%7EanKnT%5Bo>
>>>>>> to no longer receive posts from Data{Meet}.
>>>>>> Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions
>>>>>> <https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=759ccfb810341ca9efa9a780b9fe8394&email=sbadiger%40atree.org>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
>>>>>> http://datameet.org/2016/08/15/happy-independence-day-open-i
>>>>>> ndian-village-boundaries/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sharachchandra Lele
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Senior Fellow & Convenor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Centre for Environment & Development
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Phone (office) (080)-2363-5555 ext. 317;
>>>>>> (mob): +91-94800-15850
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Email: [email protected]   Skype ID:
>>>>>> sharad_lele
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Personal webpage:
>>>>>> http://atree.org/sharad_lele
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Postal address: Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Jakkur P.O.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Bangalore 560 064, INDIA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *President*, Indian Society for Ecological Economics (2014-16) (
>>>>>> www.ecoinsee.org)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Democratizing Forest Governance in India*
>>>>>> <http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198099123.do> (published
>>>>>> Sept 2014)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (edited by Sharachchandra Lele and Ajit Menon)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oxford University Press, India
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know
>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know
>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more
>>>> about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more
>>>> about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Arun Ganesh
>>> (planemad) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Planemad>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more
>>> about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nisha Thompson
>> DataMeet.org
>> [email protected]
>> skype: nishaqt
>> mobile: 962-061-2245
>>
>>
>> --
>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more
>> about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "datameet" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Arun Ganesh
> (planemad) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Planemad>
>
> --
> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more
> about us by visiting http://datameet.org
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "datameet" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about 
us by visiting http://datameet.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to