1. Thank you. I have added the same to reference section.
2. I will write a python script to update geojson based on this. I will
share once its done.
3. In the meantime, we have added Karnataka maps. I am yet to clean things
there (tasks:
https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries/blob/master/ka/ka.md)
4. I am also working on the Bihar maps. We should have it by Monday.






Thej
--
Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0

On 19 August 2016 at 00:58, Craig Dsouza <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thej,
> the census codes lookup tables 2001-2011 are attached.
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4-jbJK7OOmrckpCSkZWbnZOUFZydEFfd
> lM5eWd1dkR2Q29v
> Raphael on the group had shared them earlier.
> the original source is https://egovstandards.gov.in/mapping_land_region_
> codification
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 9:28:10 PM UTC+5:30, Thejesh GN wrote:
>>
>>
>> @arun
>> Thank you
>>
>> Couple of tasks:
>> 1. Enhance our list of references on readme.md
>> https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries
>> It will help us as we work on the maps.
>>
>> 2.  Adding CENSUS_CODE_2011 codes for villages. It can be derived
>> from CENSUS_CODE_2001 codes. But needs work and validation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Added contributing.md page
>> https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries/blob/
>> master/CONTRIBUTING.md
>>
>>
>> Thej
>> --
>> Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
>> http://thejeshgn.com
>> GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
>>
>> On 17 August 2016 at 21:17, Arun Ganesh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Its amazing to see this move forward with DataMeet, thank you Nisha and
>>> Thej for pushing this! Any immediate tasks with which others could support?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Nisha Thompson <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Sharad - To expand what Thej said:
>>>>
>>>> Thej and I met with lawyers at Alternative Law Forum in Bangalore.
>>>>
>>>> We discussed DataMeet, we are a community of people who believe in open
>>>> data and share data with one another over the group. The data is usually
>>>> government owned publicly available data that was procured through many
>>>> methods but sometimes data owned by individuals (companies, researchers,
>>>> students etc) are shared as well.
>>>>
>>>> We met with them regarding the mapping data we hold. Currently DataMeet
>>>> has the only publicly available Parliamentary and Assembly Constituency
>>>> shapefiles for download under OBDL, as well as District, some ward maps and
>>>> other isolated mapping information provided to us to maintain by the
>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>> When the community decided to start tackling the village files Thej and
>>>> I were concerned about having that much mapping data available from
>>>> government sources given the Survey of India's regulations regarding
>>>> mapping information.
>>>>
>>>> There is a lot of gray areas in the law and in the regulation.
>>>> Basically we should be concerned with copyright violation but it is
>>>> unlikely that they will go after you for that. It is important to create a
>>>> sense of demand, then document the process of getting and processing the
>>>> information and also that this information being shared is in the public
>>>> interest.
>>>>
>>>> Copyright Law - Data is not technically copyrighted but the way it is
>>>> stored and created is. Maps are creations and interpretations of data
>>>> therefore a map is technically copyrighted. Making a copy of it and
>>>> changing it's format from one to another is a gray area in copyright. (Some
>>>> say yes some say no)
>>>>
>>>> Mapping Policy - Only the Survey of India is allowed to map and
>>>> distribute maps. However, they make a lot of partnerships with vendors and
>>>> distributors for their maps. Again taking an official GOI and SOI map
>>>> (Census, NIC village provided maps) and changing the format a gray area for
>>>> copyright but whether the SOI considered it a violation of their
>>>> distribution is another story.
>>>>
>>>> What it comes down to is our intent and how risk adverse we are.
>>>>
>>>> We are not very risk adverse and we believe in open data for public
>>>> good, so we decided to move forward with the effort but proceed cautiously
>>>> and deliberately.
>>>>
>>>> If the government asks us to take them down we will but we should be
>>>> prepared to make the case for why they should provide the maps.
>>>>
>>>> We spent some time collecting demand information from people on why
>>>> mapping information needs to be available and ideally in the open.
>>>> We articulated the need to have this information in the open and with
>>>> the Save the Map campaign in full swing at the same time there has been a
>>>> reasonable public conversation about the importance of mapping information
>>>> be available, not restricted, and in the open.
>>>> We then looked at the states that already had PDF maps of their
>>>> villages available and began to convert them, people contributed their
>>>> individual efforts in converting maps and over the last several months
>>>> managed to get the whole country in some form or the other.
>>>> Now we can finish processing them and get them out to the public.
>>>>
>>>> This is an ongoing conversation and we will continue having the
>>>> conversation with ALF and others so please send any questions.
>>>>
>>>> Nisha
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Arun Ganesh <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thej, if it helps, the OSM wiki probably has the most comprehensive
>>>>> documentation of the varying boundary levels in India
>>>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India/Boundaries
>>>>>
>>>>> Would be great to get some experts well versed the the governance
>>>>> structure to take a look and provide feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Thejesh GN <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @dev
>>>>>> I was planning to rename attributes because if someone converts
>>>>>> these  geojsons  into shapefile then the name would remain same and 
>>>>>> reduce
>>>>>> confusion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2016 1:49 PM, "Devdatta Tengshe" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >i will rename the attributes so the length of attribute name is 8.
>>>>>> Can you put an issue. Easy to track.
>>>>>> There is no need to do that. This is one of the limitations of the
>>>>>> shapefile format, and we have no such limitations when we have a GeoJSON
>>>>>> file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > in census, they use subdistrict. Is it same as Taluk?
>>>>>> Pretty much. In different parts of the country, sub districts are
>>>>>> called by different names. They can be called Taluk, Tehesil, Mandal,
>>>>>> Blocs, etc, depending on where you are in the country. hence the Census
>>>>>> came up with an Abstract name for them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Devdatta
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Thejesh GN <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @arun: i will rename the attributes so the length of attribute name
>>>>>>> is 8. Can you put an issue. Easy to track.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @question:  in census, they use subdistrict. Is it same as Taluk?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also anyone has 2001 to 2011 village code mappings?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 2016 9:32 PM, "Thejesh GN" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 15 August 2016 at 18:12, "Sharad Lele [शरच्चंद्र लेले]" <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For some reason, this email by Thejesh did not show up datameet (or
>>>>>>>> maybe I just missed it?). So forwarding it to the group.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thejesh, thanks for this. I have two queries:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Is this effort different from the effort by Nisha? My impression
>>>>>>>> was that we had (with the group) access to boundaries of many more 
>>>>>>>> states,
>>>>>>>> but the issue was copyright etc, and that Nisha, you and some others 
>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>> taking legal opinion on the same. Is what you have put out a result of
>>>>>>>> that? What is the legal opinion?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Its the same effort, This is going to be our single effort. In this
>>>>>>> phase-1 we are going to publish boundaries of the villages for states 
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> are derived from the government websites. We are applying our license -
>>>>>>> ODBL to the additional skilled and creative work our volunteers do,
>>>>>>> designing, organizing, extracting, georeferencing, drawing missing 
>>>>>>> areas,
>>>>>>> adding more attributes, cleaning etc and attribute/credit the source 
>>>>>>> (Govt
>>>>>>> Website) for each state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know there are more boundaries with complicated licenses. The
>>>>>>> talks are still on, as of now we are not publishing them. we will look 
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> them in phase-2. We will keep the list updated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So as of now its govt public data + DataMeet volunteer's creative
>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2. I think I have asked this silly question on the group before,
>>>>>>>> but have to ask it again: what is the 'json' format, and why is it 
>>>>>>>> better
>>>>>>>> to put the data out in that format than in .shp? And how does one 
>>>>>>>> convert
>>>>>>>> from json to .shp?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our boundaries are incomplete in some cases or might have errors.
>>>>>>> Hence we are maintaining them in git similar to source code, where any
>>>>>>> changes to the file can be seen tracked and seen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> geojson or json is a simple text format. Which can be opened by a
>>>>>>> simple text editor and hence gives advantage to compare the versions, 
>>>>>>> do a
>>>>>>> diff just like source code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shape files are a format by ESRI is more like a binary format. Its
>>>>>>> difficult to compare them on GitHub.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would suggest http://mapshaper.org/ (Its open source so you can
>>>>>>> run internally if required) . You can convert between
>>>>>>> Shapefiles/geojson/topojson. Work on them and export. I have attached
>>>>>>> screenshots.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been using it a lot and it has really great support for all
>>>>>>> formats. I would suggest you to use http://mapshaper.org/ and let
>>>>>>> the group know if you face any issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me know if you have any more questions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>> Sharad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>> From: "Data{Meet}" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Date: 15 Aug 2016 10:27
>>>>>>>> Subject: [New post] Happy Independence Day and Open Indian Village
>>>>>>>> Boundaries
>>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thejesh GN posted: "One of the longest and most passionately
>>>>>>>> discussed subject on the Data{Meet} list is the availability of Indian
>>>>>>>> Village Boundaries in Digital format. Search for Indian Village shape 
>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>> and you can spend hours on reading interesting conversations. Over"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> New post on *Data{Meet}*
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?author=1> Happy Independence Day and Open
>>>>>>>> Indian Village Boundaries
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/2016/08/15/happy-independence-day-open-indian-village-boundaries/>
>>>>>>>>  by
>>>>>>>> Thejesh GN <http://datameet.org/?author=1>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One of the longest and most passionately discussed subject on the
>>>>>>>> Data{Meet} list is the availability of Indian Village Boundaries in 
>>>>>>>> Digital
>>>>>>>> format. Search for Indian Village shape files
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21searchin/datameet/India$20Village$20boundaries$20%7Csort:relevance>
>>>>>>>> and you can spend hours on reading interesting conversations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Over last two years different members of community have tried to
>>>>>>>> digitize
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21searchin/datameet/damle$20gujarat$20map%7Csort:relevance/datameet/zLP-eRtGxYY/FlQqBMriCAAJ>
>>>>>>>> the maps available through various government platforms or shared
>>>>>>>> the maps through their organizations
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/datameet/dBNmEToJ5CI>.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A look at the list discussion tells you that boundaries of at the
>>>>>>>> least 75% of the states are available in various formats and quality. 
>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>> we need at this point is a consolidate effort to bring them all on par 
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> format, attributes and to some level quality. So some volunteers at
>>>>>>>> Data{Meet} agreed to come together, clean up the available maps, add
>>>>>>>> attributes, make them geojson and publish them on our GitHub repository
>>>>>>>> called Indian Village Boundaries
>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries>.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course this will be an on going effort but we would love to
>>>>>>>> reach a baseline (all states) by year end. As of now I have cleaned up 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> uploaded Gujarat. I have at the least 4 more states to go live by month
>>>>>>>> end. Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Goa. I will announce them on the
>>>>>>>> list as they go live.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The boundaries are organized by state using state ISO code. All the
>>>>>>>> village boundaries are available in geojson (WGS84, EPSG4326) format. 
>>>>>>>> The project
>>>>>>>> page <https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries> gives
>>>>>>>> you the status of the data as we clean and upload. Data is not perfect 
>>>>>>>> yet,
>>>>>>>> there could many errors both in data and boundaries. You can 
>>>>>>>> contribute by
>>>>>>>> sending the pull requests. Please use the census names when correcting 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> attributes and geojson for shapes and but please source them to an 
>>>>>>>> official
>>>>>>>> source.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like everything else community creates. All map data will be
>>>>>>>> available under Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)
>>>>>>>> <http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/>. This data is
>>>>>>>> distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY 
>>>>>>>> WARRANTY;
>>>>>>>> without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
>>>>>>>> PARTICULAR PURPOSE. If you find issues we are more than happy to accept
>>>>>>>> corrections but please source them to an official source.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On this 70th Independence day, as we celebrate the historic event
>>>>>>>> of India becoming Free and Independent, Data{Meet} community 
>>>>>>>> celebrates by
>>>>>>>> cleaning, formatting and digitizing our village boundaries. Have a 
>>>>>>>> great
>>>>>>>> time using the maps and contributing back to society.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries
>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/datameet/indian_village_boundaries> *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Picture: Kedarnath range behind the Kedarnath temple early morning.
>>>>>>>> By Kaustabh, Available under CCBYSA
>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:KedarRange.jpg>.
>>>>>>>> *Thejesh GN <http://datameet.org/?author=1>* | August 15, 2016 at
>>>>>>>> 10:26 am | Tags: featured
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=featured>, Indian
>>>>>>>> Village Maps
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=indian-village-maps>,
>>>>>>>> Maps <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=maps>, open
>>>>>>>> access <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=open-access>, open
>>>>>>>> data <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=post_tag&term=open-data> |
>>>>>>>> Categories: Data <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=data>,
>>>>>>>> GIS <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=gis>, map
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=map>, mapping
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=mapping>, Open Data
>>>>>>>> India Watch
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/?taxonomy=category&term=open-data-india-watch>
>>>>>>>> | URL: http://wp.me/p2Jc3f-FK
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Comment
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/2016/08/15/happy-independence-day-open-indian-village-boundaries/#respond>
>>>>>>>>    See all comments
>>>>>>>> <http://datameet.org/2016/08/15/happy-independence-day-open-indian-village-boundaries/#comments>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe
>>>>>>>> <https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=759ccfb810341ca9efa9a780b9fe8394&email=sbadiger%40atree.org&b=%3FYLa-XFv%3F%25vJ0QUf6BfLkuXJRbZFHuFIWVgC2oZjnp%7EanKnT%5Bo>
>>>>>>>> to no longer receive posts from Data{Meet}.
>>>>>>>> Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions
>>>>>>>> <https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=759ccfb810341ca9efa9a780b9fe8394&email=sbadiger%40atree.org>.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
>>>>>>>> http://datameet.org/2016/08/15/happy-independence-day-open-
>>>>>>>> indian-village-boundaries/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sharachchandra Lele
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Senior Fellow & Convenor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Centre for Environment & Development
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                         Phone (office) (080)-2363-5555 ext. 317;
>>>>>>>> (mob): +91-94800-15850
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                         Email: [email protected]   Skype ID:
>>>>>>>> sharad_lele
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                         Personal webpage:
>>>>>>>> http://atree.org/sharad_lele
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Postal address: Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Jakkur P.O.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                         Bangalore 560 064, INDIA
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *President*, Indian Society for Ecological Economics (2014-16) (
>>>>>>>> www.ecoinsee.org)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Democratizing Forest Governance in India*
>>>>>>>> <http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198099123.do> (published
>>>>>>>> Sept 2014)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (edited by Sharachchandra Lele and Ajit Menon)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oxford University Press, India
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know
>>>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know
>>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know
>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know
>>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Arun Ganesh
>>>>> (planemad) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Planemad>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know
>>>>> more about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nisha Thompson
>>>> DataMeet.org
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> skype: nishaqt
>>>> mobile: 962-061-2245
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more
>>>> about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Arun Ganesh
>>> (planemad) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Planemad>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more
>>> about us by visiting http://datameet.org
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "datameet" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more
> about us by visiting http://datameet.org
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "datameet" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about 
us by visiting http://datameet.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to