Goodday to you all,

Just like Brian I kept Geoff Worboys list as well.
It's now 3 years later and I have bought my first Windows 7 (64bit) PC.

Should I reinstall it with Win XP or did someone already find an *easy* way
to run DP on Win7?

By the way: I don't care about printing. The DP files are on a network
drive.

So, if someone knows an easy way please share it with me.

Regards
 Gerard van Loenhout






2010/1/26 Brian Hancock <[email protected]>

> Hi Geoff,
>
> Nice research, I will keep this posting as a good reference for some of the
> options available.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geoff Worboys
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 January 2010 5:53 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Dataperf] DP into the future
>
> Hi All,
>
> Some recent posts by Don Friedman inspired this essay and idea.
> He said:
> > It would seem that the "squeeze" we all anticipated a decade
> > ago is starting to be felt.
> and
> > I miss the continuity of our DP efforts but I have to believe
> > that the handwriting is on the wall.
>
> I agree with these sentiments, the push from Microsoft to leave
> 16bit behind is beginning to really squeeze.  This post is an
> attempt to consolidate a list of some of the ways to keep DP
> productive a bit longer.
>
>
> I've been mostly silent on this list for many years... until a
> few days ago when discussions relating to running DP on x64
> versions of Windows highlighted that I probably could not run
> DP (directly) on my own system.  I believe I had read about
> this previously but because I no longer use DP on a regular
> basis I had not thought to check it out.
>
> I got my clients away from DP over 10 years go; the old DP
> application started only occasionally to retrieve very old
> payroll data (and getting more and more rare).  But this does
> highlight that there may be several (many?) years after you
> officially finish with DP that you (or your successors) may
> still want to run old DP apps.  Even now, when all the old
> payroll data is out of date even of legal requirement, I would
> be reluctant to have a system where I could no longer run DP
> (one way or another).
>
>
> I already use VMware for other reasons so my own situation is
> fairly straight forward, but I can imagine, from what I have
> seen on this list, that others have more sophisticated
> requirements than my own.
>
> There are many possibilities, below are some that I know about.
> I have NOT tried all the items in this list, they are simply
> the results of my researches (now and in the past):
>
>
> Free (DOS capable/compatible) operating systems (to be used
> directly or combined with emulators or virtualisation):
>
>    . FreeDOS - http://www.freedos.org/
>      - Claims 100% compatibility with MS-DOS.
>      - Open-source; source and binary distributions
>      - Last update: v0.73 - May 2009
>
>    . DR-DOS/OpenDOS Enhancement Project -
>        http://www.drdosprojects.de/
>      - Not exactly open-source, see the web-site
>      - Last update: v7.01.08 - Jul 2009
>
>    . ReactOS - http://www.reactos.org/en/index.html
>      - Replacement for MS Windows XP (still in alpha
>        and not feature-complete)
>      - Open source; source and binary distributions
>        including VMware and VirtualBox images.
>      - I read that it does not (yet) run 16bit apps (DOS)
>        but perhaps it can run DOSbox or other emulator
>        to allow execution of DP
>      - Last update: v0.3.11 Dec 2009
>
>    . Linux can run some of the DOS emulators below and
>      also has WINE (a Windows emulator) available that
>      may solve some situations.
>
>
> Emulators:
>
>    . DOSbox - http://www.dosbox.com/
>      - A 32bit DOS emulation application
>      - Windows, Linux, Mac and others (will run
>        inside 64bit Windows)
>      - Can execute (at least some) 16bit DOS apps including
>        many of the utilities available with FreeDOS.
>      - Open-source; source and binary distributions
>      - Last update: v0.73 - May 2009
>
>    . DOSEMU - http://www.dosemu.org
>      - A 32bit DOS emulation application
>      - Linux systems only
>      - Can execute (at least some) 16bit DOS apps
>      - Open-source; source and binary distributions
>      - Last update: v1.4.0.1 - May 2007 (but some
>        activity showing in sourceforge through 2010)
>
>    . Bochs - http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
>      - A 32bit x86 PC emulator
>      - Windows, Linux, Mac and others (will run
>        inside 64bit Windows)
>      - Can execute many x86 operating systems
>      - Open-source; source and binary distributions
>      - Last update: v2.4.2 - Nov 2009
>
>    . JPC - http://www-jpc.physics.ox.ac.uk/
>      - A (32bit?) x86 PC emulator
>      - Java (most operating systems)
>      - Can execute many x86 operating systems
>      - Open-source; source and binary distributions
>      - Last update: Jul 2009
>
>
> Virtualisation:
>
>   . Microsoft - have several virtualisation solutions;
>     Virtual PC, App-V, Hyper-V etc.
>     http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/default.aspx
>     - Latest versions run only under Windows 7
>     - Latest versions officially support only Windows 7,
>       Vista and XP guest systems
>     - Older versions can support a wider range of host and
>       guest operating systems - if you can get them.
>     - Commercial products with some free offerings
>
>   . VMware - have several virtualisation solutions;
>     Player, Workstation, Fusion, Server, ESXi etc.
>     http://www.vmware.com/
>     - (Where applicable) can run under several operating
>       systems including: Windows (XP thru 7), Linux
>       and Mac (see the Fusion product).
>     - Supports many guest operating systems including:
>       MS-DOS, Windows (WFW, 95 thru 7), Linux, Novell,
>       FreeBSD, Sun
>     - Provides additional tools to install on guests to
>       improve integration with the host, these include
>       support for guests: Win95 and later, Linux, Solaris,
>       FreeBSD, Netware
>     - Older versions can operate under (be hosted by) older
>       versions of Windows/Linux etc.
>     - Commercial products with some free offerings
>
>   . VirtualBox - http://www.virtualbox.org/
>     - Can run under several operating systems including:
>       Windows (XP thru 7), Linux, Solaris and Mac
>     - Supports many guest operating systems including:
>       MS-DOS, Windows (3.1, 95 thru 7), Linux, Solaris,
>       FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OS/2 Warp 4.5.
>     - Provides additional tools to install on guests to
>       improve integration with the host, these include
>       support for guests: WinNT and later, Linux, Solaris
>       and OS/2,
>     - Mixed licence options; includes an open-source/free
>       version (that excludes certain important features
>       like RDP and USB support) and a free for personal
>       use (or evaluation) edition with all features.
>
>
> And as I noted on a previous posting there are many other
> virtualisation/emulation products, some of which can be found
> listed here:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_platform_virtual_machines
>
>
> Idea:
>
> Where all this is leading is the idea that the community here
> could put together instructions and/or installations to assist
> users to migrate to some useful alternative DP configuration
> and so offer an even longer future.
>
>   . disk images (using FreeDOS and DP etc) ready to use in
>     one or more of the emulators listed above
>
>   . installation/zip collections of tested configurations
>     (for example; DOSbox, FreeDOS and DP).
>
>   . VMware and/or VirtualBox images with appropriate
>     installation/configuration:
>       - FreeDOS and DP
>       - Linux / WINE / DOSEMU|DOSbox and DP
>       - ReactOS and DOSbox and DP
>
>   (It would have been neat to include TAME in some/any of
>   the above... maybe he would permit an evaluation version
>   to be installed.)
>
> The first two points I suggest would best be created as network
> ready; waiting for the user to direct the configuration to
> specific network paths and printers.  Only the third option is
> probably practical to create with it's own disk capacity for
> databases etc.
>
> I don't actually have the time to try all these out myself,
> these are just some thoughts to see what people think.  If any
> people here had time to experiment with some of these options
> (or others that may be out there), then documenting the results
> could help other people looking to solve particular problems.
>
> --
> Geoff Worboys
> Telesis Computing
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dataperf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dataperf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
>
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to