Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Kirrily Robert wrote:
>
> > >There are also a variety of things that purport to be the One True
> > >Module that should be the base class for all Date:: and Time::
> > >modules. There are at least 4 of these that I know of. And I wrote one
> > >of them. All of them have shortcomings. These folks need to get
> > >together and compromise on some things, so we can actually have one of
> > >these that doesn't suck, and which people can agree on.
> >
> > Can you let us know what the other ones are?
>
> The ones that I'm currently aware of are:
>
> Date::Handler
> Date::Simple
> OO-DateTime (not implemented yet)
> Time::Object
+ Class::Date
> Date::ICal, sort of. There are two other modules (Date::ISO and
> Date::Discordian) that subclass off of this, because it was
> convenient. But I also wrote
> http://date.rcbowen.com/unified_edited.txt in which I argue that such
> a beast is a really good thing. However, it did not generate much in
> the way of actual cooperation.
Steffen
