On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, David Wheeler wrote:

> > So keep the base class named DateTime and provide a single
> > implementation class module DateTime::Gregorian, which is the default
> > unless you ask for something else.  The advantage of this is we have
> > to work through the interface issues required to do
> > DateTime::SomethingElse right away, since we are already implementing
> > another module from the get go.
> >
> > I like it...
>
> Yes, and I third this motion.

Uh, could someone summarize this thread, and the motion at hand, keeping
in mind that calendar-specific modules will be DateTime::Calendar::X, not
DateTime::X?  I've kind of lost track of what's being proposed.


-dave

/*=======================
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
=======================*/

Reply via email to