-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rich Bowen: > > I think it would be useful to have a > version of Date::ICal that inherited DateTime. Yes, that is the eventual goal. I admit that I have not been paying attention, and I don't really know the state of things right now. Is DateTime at a mature-enough stage where I could do this without annoying my users - all 6 of them ;-) - when things break? > It would have just enough code to mask some > eventual API differences. I'm sufficiently out of the loop, and absorbed enough in other projects, that I can confidently say that I won't get to this this month, and probably won't get to it next month. If you want to send patches, or commit them yourself (I think you have commit access, right?) I would be more than happy to roll releases when you tell me to. I sincerely want to get back into developing date/time thingies, but life has been unusually full of late, and this shows no signs of abating any time soon. - -- Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of earth And danced the sky on laughter-silvered wings --High Flight (John Gillespie Magee) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iD8DBQE+dKxPXP03+sx4yJMRAiJ1AJ0fwlzyf0N1FcxetSU2hi4ou7LhYgCgpNpx 7RTpzPwCbgyUMJTBunEOAyc= =gJxx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
